I. Packaging Specifications:
Logistics managers must contend with an
array of "standards" to ensure their product arrives safely at its
destination as many forms of transport or distribution packaging are regulated
throughout the world. Environmentally friendly packaging requirements are also
being mandated. Canada has a "National Packaging Protocol" which
requires a 50% reduction in packaging by the year 2000. Some European countries
require some sort of "take back" requirement for transport packaging
while others stipulate that no transport packaging is to be disposed of with
regular trash.
Professional Associations and regulatory bodies such as the International
Safe Transit Association (ISTA) may offer pre-shipment test procedures which provide a means to determine the probability of the safe arrival of a packaged product at destination. The most frequently used transport packaging standards have been developed by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and the National Safe Transit Association (NSTA). Certain
carriers require manufacturers to meet these standards before they will insure
against breakage during transport. ANSI (The American National Standards
Institute), DOT (Department of Transportation), ISO (The International
Organization for Standardization), MIL (Military Specifications), NMFC (National
Motor Freight Classification), UFC (Uniform Freight Conservatory), UN (United
Nations), among others have also developed standards.
Trade Associations represent a wide array of product categories ranging from
automobiles to pharmaceuticals and pallets to plastic. The NWPCA, (National
Wooden Pallet and Container Association), TAPPI (Technical Association of the
Pulp and Paper Industries) and FBA (Fibre Box Association) along with
manufacturers of stabilizing film, packaging foam, plastics, etc. have developed
standards as well. Standards which have been developed by packaging product
aligned agencies must be reviewed carefully as to their applicability within the
industry as the basic incentive to enhance the sales of their particular line of
packaging may cause them to over specify materials or create conservative
standards relative to the environmental issues.
In addition to all of those mentioned above, many industries have established
their own standards. This allows them to meet the particular needs of their
products and transportation routes and is some cases to use less material than
would be required by other established standards. The AIAG (Automotive Industry
Action Group), ISM-RIF PSS (Institute for Supply Management-Rail
Industry Forum Packaging Standards Subcommittee), the AAR (Association of
American Railroads) and RAC- 6000 (Railway Association of Canada) are examples.
Many of the organizational standards being developed today are performance
oriented, and are designed with the ultimate goal of protecting the product
during transport. Like the various tests defined in this Manual such as the
Compression Test, ECT (Edgewise Compression Test), Mullen Test (Bursting
Strength) and the Tear Test (the ISTA, ASTM and NSTA guidelines and testing
procedures are performance based standards. Performance based standards or
specifications are those that describe measurable performance characteristics on
the completed container system or subsystem rather than specifying, in detail,
the materials of construction.
The Packaging Specifications in this Manual serve to qualify its general
packaging guidelines relative to particular products. Though product load
dimensions, quantities and gross weights as well as packaging descriptions are
quite detailed in the Specifications section, it remains the overall intent of
the PSS Manual to establish safe and economical performance standards for
packages throughout the distribution channel. It also remains the responsibility
of the supplier to advise the ISM-RIF PSS of recommended improvements and
necessary changes to the specifications contained herein.
Unless other wise indicated, use of the standard packaging materials
specified in this section is strongly recommended though the height, width,
length and gross weight of the product may vary somewhat. When the opportunity
to substitute "equivalent" packaging materials for the ones
indicated is permitted, a note advising this fact will appear in the Packaging
Description portion of the specification. Equivalent packaging materials must
meet PSS Manual general guidelines. They must provide the intended function with
similar types of material. For example, a suitable and more economical wooden
crate may be substituted for the collapsible, wooden crate specified. However,
wirebound crates or the use of steel strapping to strengthen sidewalls does not
meet the guidelines and therefore, under normal circumstances, is not an
acceptable "equivalent". Durability and rigidity are reasons wooden
crates have been specified. As a result, corrugated crates must not be
substituted for wood when the specification calls for wood as by definition they
are not the equivalent.
II. Numbering Convention:
The specifications within this Manual have been grouped by relative category. Generally, the first three letters of the common name of the specified item are used to identify it followed by
consecutive, one or two-digit numbers. One exception to this rule may appear in
the Packaging Materials and Freight Car Components Specifications sections which
share the same general numerical range and therefore may not strictly adhere to
the consecutive numbering convention within their respective categories.
However, consecutive numbers do appear between these two categories and within
the other categories as indicated below: |
Resources:
Raymond, Michele, Sheri Wanamaker, Laura Pettit, Transportation Packaging and the Environment, Raymond Communications, Inc., Riverdale, MD 1994
Soroka, Walter, Fundamentals of Packing Technology, Richard Warrington
Publishing, Herndon, VA 1995 |